Home Your Account FAQ Topics Content Submit News Top 10
  Login/Create an Account    

Menu

Amiga600_FPGA.gif Amiga FPGA Accelerator
· Introduction
· Pictures
· Voltage Level Translation
· Sharing ideas
· Who helped?New content !
· Apollo-team chat

Amiga600_FPGA.gif Vampire 600 V1
tree-L2.gif About
tree-T.gif Schematics
tree-T.gif Core
tree-L.gif Soldering
· Terms of service
· Ordering
· Core upload
· Vampire 600 map
· All News

Amiga600_FPGA.gif Vampire 600 V2

Amiga600_FPGA.gif Vampire 1200
· All News

Amiga_Ball.gif Amiga Talk Talk
· Amiga 1200 Coldfire
· Talk regarding A608
· Amiga PPC

icon_members.gif Amiga Repair
· Amiga 600 restoration
· Mouse repair
· Cold solder joint
· Amiga 600 repair
· Keyboard repair

favoritos.gif Amiga Tutorials
· Install WB from WinUAE
· Play HAM Video

som_themes.gif Amiga Testings
· Amiga 600 plays video
icon_community.gif Forum
nuke.gif Downloads
home.gif Web Hosting
som_downloads.gif Web links

Info

Only registered users can shout. Please login or create an account.

Vampire 600 V1: Vampire 600 1.3
Posted on Monday, July 02 2012 @ 17:06:29 CDT by majsta

For past 10 days I m working on Accelerator redesign. Basic changes are related to voltage level translation because in previous versions voltage level translation was not complete. Using 74ALVT162245 devices, who have 5V tolerant I/O's, was not best solution because those devices can be only used in process of translation CMOS to LVCMOS but those devices was unusable to translate back LVCMOS to CMOS. In this case all of the signals coming from Amiga 600 board was readable by FPGA but signals going from FPGA to Amiga 600 board was unusable because those signals were never translated to CMOS because 74ALVT162245 is not real translator just transceiver who have 5V tolerant I/O's. Lot of people are talking that rest of Amiga hardware can work with LVCMOS signals but with this new design I just wanted to be shore that level translation isn't problem in design of this Accelerator board. So I decided to use dual supply translating transceiver, and yes like I said before I didn't use those devices because they can complicate design and drive to number of problems on 2 layer PCB. My choice was 74ALVC164245 and main difference here is that VCC(A) is tracking A side of the device and VCC(B) is tracking B side so if we use 5V on one and 3.3V on other side we have complete level translation between CMOS and LVCMOS and vice verse. Other changes on design are related to proper solving BR, BGACK, BG, RESET, HALT and some more signals. Those changes was needed because I may decide to have original CPU up and running for some time until FPGA takes over the bus. New series of devices are ordered, and PCB will be produced in next few days. Here is tracking number so you can track order if you want :) RC110182668HK


Sponsored links

Related Links
· More about Amiga FPGA accelerator
· News by majsta


Most read story about Amiga FPGA accelerator:
HDMI test 1


Article Rating
Average Score: 4.66
Votes: 3


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad



Options

 Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

 Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend


Sorry, Comments are not available for this article.
Web site powered by PHP-Nuke

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest
You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php or ultramode.txt
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.158 Seconds